Skip to content

The Risk-Mitigation Power of Equity Theory

Equity theory, developed by J. Stacy Adams in the 1960s, is a psychological concept that focuses on the idea of fairness and balance in the workplace. It suggests that employees compare their input (effort, skills, time) and output (salary, benefits, recognition) to that of their colleagues to determine whether they are being treated fairly. Equity theory is neither good nor bad on its own; however, when employees end up feeling that they are being treated unjustly or learn that they are being compensated differently for similar work, it can create a work environment that is prone to risk. Employees generally go through three steps to reach a conclusion:

  1. Comparison Process: Employees engage in a mental comparison process where they assess the ratio of their contributions to their rewards (input-to-outcome ratio). They also compare this ratio to the input-to-outcome ratio of their coworkers.
  2. Equity: When employees perceive a balance or equity between their input and outcomes compared to their colleagues, they feel content and satisfied with their job and believe they are being treated fairly. This perception of fairness fosters positive workplace attitudes and motivation.
  3. Underpayment and Overpayment: If an employee perceives that they are receiving less than they deserve compared to their peers (underpayment inequity), they may experience feelings of injustice and may reduce their effort, seek a raise, leave the organization, or engage in counterproductive behaviors to restore equity. Conversely, if they perceive they are receiving more than their peers (overpayment inequity), they may feel guilty or anxious and may try to rectify the situation. (See note on Equity Sensitivity Below)

Impact on Organizational Leaders

Equity theory highlights the importance of fairness in the workplace. Leaders should strive to create a work environment where employees believe their contributions are recognized and rewarded fairly. This involves transparent and consistent reward systems, clear communication about performance expectations, and addressing any perceived inequities promptly. It's important to note that equity is subjective, and what one person considers fair may not be the same for another. Therefore, managers must consider individual perceptions and be aware of the potential for bias or misinterpretation when assessing equity in the workplace. One such influence is equity sensitivity.

Equity Sensitivity: What is it and how do organizations achieve it?

Being “equity-sensitive” refers to an individual’s or organization’s heightened awareness and sensitivity to issues of fairness, justice, and equity, especially in the context of decision-making, policies, and practices. Equity-sensitive individuals and organizations prioritize the promotion of fairness and strive to ensure that opportunities, resources, and outcomes are distributed fairly among all members or stakeholders. These people and organizations tend to:

  • Be Fairness Advocates: Equity-sensitive individuals or organizations are strong advocates for fairness and justice in various aspects of life, including the workplace, education, society, and beyond. They are committed to ensuring that everyone has equal opportunities and is treated fairly, regardless of their background, characteristics, or circumstances.
  • Have Acute Awareness of Bias and Discrimination: Equity-sensitive individuals and organizations are acutely aware of bias, discrimination, and systemic inequalities that can exist in society. They actively seek to identify and rectify instances of bias or discrimination in policies, procedures, and practices.
  • Desire Inclusivity and Diversity: Equity-sensitive people and organizations place a high value on diversity and inclusivity. They recognize that diverse perspectives and backgrounds enrich decision-making processes and contribute to a more equitable environment. They actively promote diversity initiatives to create inclusive spaces.
  • Adhere to Equitable Decision-Making: Equity-sensitive decision-making involves considering the potential impact of decisions on different groups and striving to make choices that do not disproportionately benefit or harm any particular group. This can apply to hiring practices, resource allocation, promotions, and more.
  • Listen with Empathy: Equity-sensitive individuals and organizations listen actively to the experiences and concerns of marginalized or underrepresented groups. They demonstrate empathy and a willingness to address these concerns, making efforts to create a safe and supportive environment for open dialogue.
  • Seek Continuous Learning and Improvement: Being equity-sensitive involves recognizing that equity is an ongoing process. Individuals and organizations continually educate themselves about social justice issues, update their policies and practices, and adapt to changing circumstances to enhance fairness.

In short, being equity-sensitive means prioritizing fairness, justice, and inclusivity in decision-making and actions. It involves recognizing and actively addressing issues related to bias and discrimination while advocating for equitable outcomes and opportunities for all individuals or groups, especially those who may be marginalized or disadvantaged.

Equity theory can be a strong tool in framing the behaviors that are witnessed. It can also provide some direction on what can be done to address equity sensitive employees.

In summary, equity theory in the workplace emphasizes the significance of fairness and balance in employee-employer relationships. It underscores the idea that employees' perceptions of fairness in the distribution of rewards and recognition play a crucial role in their job satisfaction, motivation, and overall performance. When employees perceive that there is not fairness or equity in the workplace, according to equity theory, they may take various actions to address the perceived inequity. These actions are motivated by their desire to restore a sense of balance and fairness. While the motives are genuine, the results can leave an organization teetering in bewilderment on why productivity and employee satisfaction has dropped.

By focusing on equity, organizations can reduce the risk of high turnover rates, low productivity, employee burnout, and resistance to change—creating a more efficient, more satisfied workforce and a stronger organization overall.

© virtosmedia, 123RF Free Images

Corporate Office
151 W. Fourth Street #27
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

© 2024 RiskVersity. All rights reserved.

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram